Posted by: thediygeochemist | April 9, 2010

I do not think that word means what you think it means!

Re-reading my NSF ratings sheets, I was struck by statements made by two reviewers:

The reviewer who rated my IM “Very Good” began the review: “The applicant’s academic preparation is strong, but not unique.”

One of the reviewers who rated my IM “Fair” started this way: “The applicant’s academic preparation was good, but not unique.”

I want to know what qualifies as “unique” academic preparation. I mean really, unique? Last I heard, that word meant “one of a kind.” But I seriously doubt that the NSF reviewers want someone whose preparation was really unique.

Trying to read between the lines, I assume that what the reviewers were saying was that my academic background was relatively strong but still lacking in some regard. They held some ideal view of academic preparation in their minds (what they considered “unique”) and I fell short. But this vision of theirs is really not unique preparation: it is strong. They don’t really (nor should they really) want a “unique” academic experience, like someone who’d learned everything she knew about meteorology from a hermit living atop a mountaintop.

If I am interpreting them correctly, then rather than making vague statements I want to hear how I was lacking. The second reviewer goes on to do so–saying that if I didn’t have any pubs, I should at least have presented something (at an institutional fair if nothing else). This is valuable info. [I didn’t do this because LocalStateU’s research fair is in January, and I did my research there January to August. By the time the next fair rolled around, I was off at grad school.]

I think “unique” is going to be the next “special”–one of those words that gets overused until it becomes watered down to the point of being meaningless.



  1. well, you’ll be in better shape to apply next year, right? ๐Ÿ™‚
    (also, if you want, i can send you my essays. just email!) ๐Ÿ™‚

    • Can I apply as a 2nd-year grad student? I thought that 1st year was the last year you could do so. But it would be a useless exercise anyway: I’m still not going to have any pubs by then. SL is an awesome guy, but he’s the world’s slowest writer. He just published some work that was done 3-4 years ago…

  2. yup, you can still apply your second year. there’s also the DOE SCGF (, which is pretty new…your research sounds like you might be eligible for it

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: